corner
corner

Phys. Rev. E 70, 043301 (2004) [4 pages]

Comment on “Jamming at zero temperature and zero applied stress: The epitome of disorder”

Download: PDF (33 kB) Buy this article Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)

Aleksandar Donev1,2, Salvatore Torquato1,2,3,*, Frank H. Stillinger3, and Robert Connelly4
1Program in Applied and Computational Mathematics, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA
2Materials Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA
3Department of Chemistry, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA
4Department of Mathematics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA

Received 31 January 2004; published 25 October 2004

O’Hern, Silbert, Liu and Nagel Phys. Rev. E. 68 011306 (2003) claim that a special point J of a “jamming phase diagram” (in density, temperature, stress space) is related to random close packing of hard spheres and that it represents, for their suggested definitions of jammed and random, the recently introduced maximally random jammed state. We point out several difficulties with their definitions and question some of their claims. Furthermore, we discuss the connections between their algorithm and other hard-sphere packing algorithms in the literature.

© 2004 The American Physical Society

URL:
http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.70.043301
DOI:
10.1103/PhysRevE.70.043301
PACS:
05.20.Jj, 61.20.−p

*Electronic address: torquato@electron.princeton.edu

See Also

Original Article: Corey S. O’Hern, Leonardo E. Silbert, Andrea J. Liu, and Sidney R. Nagel, Jamming at zero temperature and zero applied stress: The epitome of disorder, Phys. Rev. E 68, 011306 (2003).