corner
corner

Phys. Rev. E 65, 021702 (2002) [16 pages]

Two experimental tests of a fluctuation-induced first-order phase transition: Intensity fluctuation microscopy at the nematic–smectic-A transition

Download: PDF (893 kB) Buy this article Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)

Anand Yethiraj*, Ranjan Mukhopadhyay, and John Bechhoefer
Department of Physics, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada V5A 1S6

Received 1 August 2001; published 16 January 2002

We have developed a new, extremely sensitive real-space technique (intensity fluctuation microscopy) to probe the order of the nematic–smectic-A (NA) transition. Using this technique, we show that the NA transition in 4-n-octyl-4-cyanobiphenyl (8CB) is clearly first order, contrary to calorimetric studies but in agreement with conclusions drawn from front-velocity measurements. We characterize the strength of the discontinuity at the first-order transition by the dimensionless quantity t0=(TNA-T*)/T*. By precisely measuring t0, we have made the first detailed tests of predictions based on the Halperin-Lubensky-Ma (HLM) theory of fluctuation-induced, first-order phase transitions. First, we explore the effect of an external magnetic field on the NA transition. Although modest fields (of order 10 T) are predicted to drive the weakly first-order transition in pure 8CB second order, we observe no such effect; we establish instead that the lower bound on this critical field is 30T. Likewise, we observe no effect in mixtures of 8CB with its longer chemical homolog 4-n-decyl-4-cyanobiphenyl (10CB). Second, we examine the dependence of t0 as a function of 8CB–10CB mixture concentration and find that the data in mixtures with small nematic temperature range are well-fit by the parameters derived by Anisimov et al. based on calorimetric measurements. As we increase the nematic range (by using concentrations closer to pure 8CB), the measured t0 deviates more and more from the HLM predictions. Smectic fluctuations, which are neglected in the HLM calculation, are an obvious candidate to explain such a discrepancy, but one’s naive expectation is that they would reduce t0 below the HLM levels, whereas the observed values are too large. However, a recent renormalization-group calculation concludes that smectic fluctuations, surprisingly, should indeed increase t0, explaining the observations presented here.

© 2002 The American Physical Society

URL:
http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.65.021702
DOI:
10.1103/PhysRevE.65.021702
PACS:
64.70.Md, 61.30.Gd, 64.60.Fr

*Present address: FOM Institute for Atomic and Molecular Physics, Kruislaan 407, 1098 SJ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Present address: Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Pennsylvania, 209 South 33rd St., Philadelphia, PA 19104-6396