Phys. Rev. E 64, 016132 (2001) [7 pages]Scientific collaboration networks. II. Shortest paths, weighted networks, and centralitySee Also: Erratum Received 1 February 2001; published 28 June 2001 Using computer databases of scientific papers in physics, biomedical research, and computer science, we have constructed networks of collaboration between scientists in each of these disciplines. In these networks two scientists are considered connected if they have coauthored one or more papers together. Here we study a variety of nonlocal statistics for these networks, such as typical distances between scientists through the network, and measures of centrality such as closeness and betweenness. We further argue that simple networks such as these cannot capture variation in the strength of collaborative ties and propose a measure of collaboration strength based on the number of papers coauthored by pairs of scientists, and the number of other scientists with whom they coauthored those papers. © 2001 The American Physical Society URL:
http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.64.016132
DOI:
10.1103/PhysRevE.64.016132
PACS:
89.75.Hc, 89.65.-s, 89.70.+c, 01.30.-y
See AlsoErratum: M. E. J. Newman, Erratum: Scientific collaboration networks. II. Shortest paths, weighted networks, and centrality [Phys. Rev. E 64, 016132 (2001)], Phys. Rev. E 73, 039906 (2006). |
