corner
corner

Phys. Rev. E 47, 875–884 (1993)

Multifractal formalism for fractal signals: The structure-function approach versus the wavelet-transform modulus-maxima method

Download: PDF (497 kB) Buy this article Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)

J. F. Muzy
Centre de Recherche Paul Pascal, Avenue Schweitzer, 33600 Pessac, France

E. Bacry
Centre de Recherche Paul Pascal, Avenue Schweitzer, 33600 Pessac, France
DMI, Ecole Normale Supérieure, 45 rue d’Ulm, 75230 Paris CEDEX, France

A. Arneodo
Centre de Recherche Paul Pascal, Avenue Schweitzer, 33600 Pessac, France

Received 26 May 1992; published in the issue dated February 1993

Several attempts have been made recently to generalize the multifractal formalism, originally introduced for singular measures, to fractal signals. We report on a systematic comparison between the structure-function approach, pioneered by Parisi and Frisch [in 2 Proceedings of the International School on Turbulence and Predictability in Geophysical Fluid Dynamics and Climate Dynamics, edited by M. Ghil, R. Benzi, and G. Parisi (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1985), p. 84] to account for the multifractal nature of fully developed turbulent signals, and an alternative method we have developed within the framework of the wavelet-transform analysis. We comment on the intrinsic limitations of the structure-function approach; this technique has fundamental drawbacks and does not provide a full characterization of the singularities of a signal in many cases. We demonstrate that our method, based on the wavelet-transform modulus-maxima representation, works in most situations and is likely to be the ground of a unified multifractal description of self-affine distributions. Our theoretical considerations are both illustrated on pedagogical examples and supported by numerical simulations.

© 1993 The American Physical Society

URL:
http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.47.875
DOI:
10.1103/PhysRevE.47.875
PACS:
02.50.-r, 05.40.+j, 47.27.Gs